Skip to main content

Table 1 Absolute- and relative LVOTd errors for the DL model on the test set

From: Deep learning for automated left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements in 2D echocardiography

Data groupings (n = images, patients)

Mean absolute LVOTd error (95% CI)

Median absolute LVOTd error (IQR)

Mean relative LVOTd error (95% CI)

Median relative LVOTd error (IQR)

All data (n = 194, 94 patients)

1.04 (0.90–1.19) mm

0.76 (0.39–1.25) mm

4.6 (3.9–5.2) %

3.2 (1.7–5.7) %

PLAX data (n = 100, 56 patients)

1.11 (0.93–1.36) mm

0.86 (0.49–1.32) mm

5.1 (4.1–6.1) %

3.7 (2.1–5.9) %

ZPLAX data (n = 94, 41 patients)

0.94 (0.75–1.13) mm

0.59 (0.31–1.23) mm

4.0 (3.2–4.8) %

2.5 (1.2–5.2) %

Removing “Low” quality data (n = 135, 72 patients)

0.87 (0.74–1.00) mm

0.63 (0.35–1.12) mm

3.8 (3.2–4.4) %

2.8 (1.6–4.9) %