Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographics, tricuspid valve and right heart parameters in all three study groups

From: Three-dimensional analysis of the tricuspid annular geometry in healthy subjects and in patients with different grades of functional tricuspid regurgitation

 

No or mild TR

(n = 60)

Moderate TR

(n = 49)

p-value*

Severe TR

(n = 46)

p-value†

Sex (female)

30 (50)

30 (61.2)

0.241

28 (60.9)

0.972

Age, yrs

48.3 ± 16.6

64.4 ± 14.0

< 0.001

73.9 ± 10.2

< 0.001

Weight, kg

77.8 ± 15.6

77.7 ± 16.9

0.982

78.8 ± 16.4

0.752

Height, cm

173.7 ± 10.3

168.9 ± 10.5

0.022

166.3 ± 7.8

0.201

BSA, m2

1.9 ± 0.2

1.9 ± 0.2

0.536

1.9 ± 0.2

0.989

Atrial fibrillation

0 (0)

26 (46.9)

< 0.001

44 (95.7)

< 0.001

PASP, mmHg

-

41.8 ± 14.1

-

43.1 ± 10.1

0.648

TA area, cm2

8.3 ± 2.0

10.7 ± 2.3

< 0.001

15.2 ± 3.0

< 0.001

TA perimeter, cm

10.4 ± 1.3

11.8 ± 1.2

< 0.001

14.1 ± 1.4

< 0.001

Major axis, cm

3.6 ± 0.5

4.0 ± 0.5

< 0.001

4.7 ± 0.6

< 0.001

Minor axis, cm

2.8 ± 0.4

3.2 ± 0.5

< 0.001

3.9 ± 0.5

< 0.001

4Ch diameter, cm

3.0 ± 0.5

3.6 ± 0.5

< 0.001

4.4 ± 0.5

< 0.001

2Ch diameter, cm

3.0 ± 0.5

3.4 ± 0.5

< 0.001

4.0 ± 0.5

< 0.001

Max tenting height, cm

0.5 ± 0.2

0.7 ± 0.2

< 0.001

0.9 ± 0.3

< 0.001

Coaptation height, cm

0.4 ± 0.2

0.5 ± 0.2

< 0.001

0.7 ± 0.4

< 0.001

Tenting volume, ml

1.0 ± 0.6

1.7 ± 1.2

< 0.001

3.9 ± 2.3

< 0.001

Sphericity index, %

79.8 ± 9.1

79.6 ± 9.5

0.930

83.7 ± 8,7

0.031

FWS, %

-29.6 ± 3.9

-20.5 ± 7.0

 < 0.001

-20.2 ± 5.7

0.830

TAPSE, cm

2.2 ± 0.4

1.5 ± 0.6

 < 0.001

1.3 ± 0.4

0.053

  1. Values are mean ± SD or n (%)
  2. BSA body surface area, 4Ch four chambers, FWS free wall strain, PASP pulmonary artery systolic pressure, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, TA tricuspid annulus, TR tricuspid regurgitation, 2Ch two chambers
  3. *Comparison between no or mild TR and moderate TR
  4. Comparison between moderate TR and severe TR